logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.11.07 2014고합950
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(특수강간)등
Text

1. The Defendants are not guilty. 2. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is respectively published.

Reasons

1. The part concerning rape of Defendant A

A. The summary of the facts charged was on August 2013, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the “G” entertainment tavern located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, a female employee H and drinking; and (b) the Defendant was her son, who continued to sit in the front of H’s bridge and her son, and her son her son her son her son her son her son her son, and her her her son her her son her her son her under the clothes.

Therefore, while H was pushed down with his own sexual organ, the Defendant, stating that “I am only. I am off the bridge on the H’s bridge,” and added the bucks on the H’s buck part, which divided Bucks into “H’s ship by hand,” which led H to the suppression of H’s resistance, and then raped by inserting the sexual organ.

Accordingly, H went out of the room after subtracting his body from H's body, and asked male employees to see the fact of damage as it is, and did not talk about the fact of damage, and he went to another room. A male employee urged that "I continue to find his son. I will go to go to the room only once because I would cut off from the room."

Recognizing the fact that H puts questions about the sex relations in the room, the Defendant, with the knowledge of the fact that H puts up writing about the fact that he had sexual intercourse, h h sciss the end of this day, and if you do so, h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h not h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h

B. The Defendant asserts that, at the time and place indicated in the facts charged in the instant case, only sexual intercourse exists with H, and that there was no assault or intimidation against H.

H. Defendant H.

arrow