A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seven months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 2016, the Defendant sent 50% of the 50% of the face value on the delivery day to the Victim G from the “F” located in the Sindong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, the Defendant would transfer the remainder when the following items are delivered:

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant was supplied with an excessive work from the injured party, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to remit the payment to the injured party.

Ultimately, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) supplied the victim with an excessive amount of KRW 12,767,00,00 at the market price around February 2, 2016; (c) acquired the said goods in the manner of not paying the price even after being supplied with an excessive amount of KRW 53,471,00 at the market price around February 3, 2016; (d) KRW 735,00 at the market price around February 3, 2016; and (e) KRW 20,859,000 at the market price around February 4, 2016; and (e) KRW 53,471,00 at the market price of KRW 1,227, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A written protocol concerning the examination of the suspect to each prosecutor or the police (including the whole part of the suspect);

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each letter of H and I, and facts written by J;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of statutes governing contracts, invoices, receipt certificates, photographs at each delivery site, stenographic records, text messages, account transactions details, stenographic records (toon February 15, 2016), and stenographic records (to on February 11, 2016);

1. The evidence duly adopted and examined by this court in light of the pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts and Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, comprehensively including the provision of Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the selection of punishment, there is no reason [the scope of recommending punishment] for sentencing of imprisonment [the grounds for sentencing of punishment] [the grounds for special sentencing] (from June to January 16)] of the basic area (the grounds for special sentencing] [the judgment of sentencing]. In particular, the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, in full view of the contract which the defendant directly prepared and sent to the injured party, telephone communications and text messages between the defendant and the injured party, each receipt of text, and account transaction details, etc., the defendant received from the injured party and provided the above contract.