(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2018.11.23 2018고단382

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2018.11.23 2018고단382

도로교통법위반(음주운전)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On August 30, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violating road traffic law (drinking driving) at the public support of the Daejeon District Court on August 30, 2007, and a fine of KRW 3 million as a crime of violating road traffic law (drinking driving) at the Daejeon District Court on October 15, 2013.

[Criminal facts] On August 16, 2018, around 13:35, the Defendant: (a) around the village hall located in the Sari-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-

At the section of this section, 0.229% alcohol concentration in blood was drunk, B gallon was driven by B gallon.

As a result, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the offender's place and the result of regulating drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and text of the judgment;

1. Article 148-2(1)1 and Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act regarding criminal facts; Article 148-2(1)1 and Article 44 of the same Act; Article 0.229 of the blood alcohol concentration at the time of committing a crime on the grounds for sentencing of sentence of imprisonment is very high.

In the past, the Defendant had two times the record of committing the same kind of crime, such as driving under the influence of alcohol with a concentration of not less than 0.2% during blood.

However, when the defendant did not reflect and did not meet the time of the last punishment, the defendant committed the crime in this case, and had shown a very poor attitude, such as refusing to receive the copy of the indictment or attending the trial on the trial date in the trial process.

Although the Defendant complained of a prior wife while “I are currently against and without good health,” this is merely an argument that I want to be exempted from punishment in front of the eye, and there is room for reflective or edification against the Defendant.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

It is reasonable to punish defendants strictly.

Therefore, it is true.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 공주지원 2018.06.22 2018고단161

-대전지방법원 공주지원 2018.05.25 2018고단96

-대전지방법원 공주지원 2018.09.21 2018고단352

-대전지방법원 공주지원 2018.06.22 2017고단451

-대전지방법원 공주지원 2017.11.03 2017고단298