logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.12.13 2019가단118323
구상금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly committed against the Plaintiff KRW 59,685,810 and KRW 38,635,150 among them, respectively, from September 1, 2017 to KRW 21,050.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a mutual aid company that entered into an automobile mutual aid agreement with D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) on E-si (hereinafter “instant taxi”), and Defendant B is the driver of FioSF passenger car (hereinafter “Defendant”) and Defendant C is the owner of the Defendant vehicle.

B. At around 04:30 on July 4, 2016, Defendant B, while driving the Defendant Company, was negligent in driving the Defendant Company along the three-lane of H in front of the H located in G in G in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, North Korea (hereinafter “instant accident”). The passenger I of the instant taxi due to the instant accident, i.e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e.,

C. 1) Around July 12, 2017, 2017, the Daegu District Court rendered a ruling of recommending reconciliation that “the Plaintiff shall pay KRW 50 million to I until August 31, 2017,” and the said ruling became final and conclusive around that time. From September 2, 2016 to August 31, 2017, the Plaintiff paid I insurance proceeds of KRW 9,365,150, and KRW 500,000 according to the said ruling of recommending reconciliation, and paid KRW 66,735,150,000,000 as the above litigation costs, including KRW 2377,00,000,000 from September 2, 2016 to KRW 66,735,65,150,000,000,000,000 as the aggregate of the treatment costs from September 2, 2016 to KRW 96,601,6.500.

[Reasons for Recognition] Defendant B: The fact that there is no dispute between Defendant C and Defendant C, entry of Gap 1 through 7, and evidence of 9 through 13 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the facts found in the above Paragraph 1, the non-party company is a passenger I and J as the operator of the instant taxi under Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act.

arrow