The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In relation to the crime of intrusion upon residence as indicated in the lower judgment, the Defendant: (a) opened a door to the front door to enter the living room; (b) opened a door to the front door that was not corrected without the consent of the said victim as stated in this part of the facts constituting the crime; and (c) opened a door to the front door that was not corrected without the said victim’s permission; and (d) in relation to the special injury crime as indicated in the lower judgment, the Defendant did not assault Q, and thus, carried a dangerous object, such as

B. At the time of each of the instant crimes, the Defendant was in a state of weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to the recognition disorder of proof.

C. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. On September 18, 2019, the prosecutor ex officio makes an indictment for the crime of special injury as indicated in the holding of the court below on September 18, 2019.

In the time and place stated in the paragraph, the application for changes in the bill of indictment for the victim Q Q from the lock is stated in the real name, but it is unrealised.

In this ward, “Isson was a day, her fly fly, her fly,” and asked her “her fly fly,” and the victim “Is her fly fly,” and “Is fly fly, if Ising to her fly, if I would have come to her fly, her fly fly,” without any reason, the victim’s face 3 times with the victim’s face her own fly fly, without any reason. In other words, Is the victim’s face fry, and continued to her fry the victim’s fry, and her fry of a glass bottle, which is a dangerous thing that he she frily fly fly, and her frily fly fly, and her frily fly fly fly fly fly fly fly, with the victim’s face fy.