logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.06.19 2018고단513
현주건조물방화예비
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized evidence 1 to 4 shall be confiscated from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 15, 2018, at around 00:51 around 00:51, the Defendant visited the D Operation “E cafeteria” on the first floor of the Chuncheon-si Building C, and received notification to pay a penalty by a police officer who called “dact of disturbance of drinking” under the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, who sent to the service of customers by visiting the said restaurant at around 00:47 on the same day, he saw the above restaurant to drive away by the male employees working at the said restaurant, and saw the above restaurant and the above restaurant building.

Accordingly, on May 15, 2018, the Defendant was “G gas station” located in Chuncheon-si F on a taxi on May 15, 2018, and purchased approximately three liters from a main facility installed therein, and then divided into four gasolines, and prepared a cremation yard and a box for attaching a fire. However, upon receipt of a report, the Defendant did not reach the commencement of fire-fighting act on the wind arrested by a police officer arrested.

Accordingly, the defendant was prepared for the purpose of harming a building in which people such as the above D exist.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with respect to H and D;

1. The handling list of reported cases and a penalty payment notification, respectively;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs and gasoline purchase receipts;

1. Articles 175 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 48(1) of the Confiscation Criminal Act, is highly likely to be subject to criticism by committing the instant crime during a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with labor for a special assault, etc. (determined on August 24, 2017).

There is a good condition that can be considered in the process and motive of committing the instant crime.

It is difficult to see that the defendant is subject to criminal punishment, and the defendant has a lot of history.

The crime of this case is legally punished by imprisonment.

arrow