beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 99,022,00 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from November 3, 2017 to October 6, 2018.
Reasons
1. In the absence of a dispute between the parties to the determination of the cause of the claim, or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence of Nos. 1 to 13 (including each number), and witness D's testimony, facts as stated in the reasons of the claim can be acknowledged.
According to the above facts, the Defendants jointly compensate the Plaintiff for damages due to joint tort, which is KRW 9,022,00, and KRW 5% as prescribed by the Civil Act from November 3, 2017 to October 6, 2018, the day when the complaint of this case was finally served on the Defendants, and the following day to May 31, 2019, Article 3(1) main text of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, Article 2(2) of the Addenda to the Regulations on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings (amended by Presidential Decree No. 29768, May 21, 2019), Article 3(1) main text of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings (amended by Presidential Decree No. 29768, May 21, 2019); Article 3(1)3(1) of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings is obligated to pay interest Rate
2. On September 29, 2017, the Defendant Company concluded a contract for attracting investment and an asset trading agency service with the Plaintiff Company on the part of September 29, 2017, and subsequently arranged the conclusion of a contract for the purchase and sale of convertible bonds between the Plaintiff and E Company pursuant to the above contract, and duly received KRW 90 million at the fees incidental thereto. However, the evidence submitted by the Defendant Company alone is insufficient to acknowledge the above assertion, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.
The defendant company's assertion is without merit.
3. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified.