logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.08.22 2019고단3985
출입국관리법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On November 8, 2018, Defendant A was sentenced to one year of suspended execution for four months, due to a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. at the Incheon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 16, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

If a foreigner intends to be employed in the Republic of Korea, he/she shall obtain the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities, and no person shall employ a person who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

Nevertheless, the Defendants employed foreigners who do not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities as marina branch offices, and operated marina business establishment from the fourth floor of the building located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City to "D", and recruited Defendant B and Defendant A to divide their respective earnings into 6:4. The instant indictment states that "from August 21, 2018 to August 27, 2018, the time when each of the above foreigners was discovered at the business establishment "D" includes the time when each of the above foreigners was discovered, and the written statement prepared by the above foreigners from August 27, 2018 to August 27, 2018, and there is no evidence to acknowledge the disadvantage that each of the above foreigners might suffer from actual correction within the scope of the period of employment without any risk of modification." However, there is no other evidence to acknowledge that each of the above foreigners might suffer from any disadvantage within the scope of the right of defense ex officio.

The status of stay B-1 (Visa exemption), which is a woman of Thai nationality, who has the status of stay for job-seeking activities, is not the status of stay for B-1 (Visa exemption), and is employed as a massage with a promise to pay 50% of the price of the massage to the E (n, F), G (n, H), I (n, J, L), K (n, N), M (n, female and P).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A copy of the foreign employment certificate prepared by the defendant A;

1. Each statement in the preparation of E, G, I,K, M, andO;

1. A written accusation or accusation against an immigration offender;

arrow