The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On June 27, 2014, around 15:20 on June 27, 2014, the victim C was faced with the Defendant’s right shoulder and right shoulder due to mountain scam, which were in the front of the “E” located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, and had the Defendant’s face at least once due to his head.

The defendant has set up against this, and damaged the luxics of 10,000 won at the market price owned by the victim by brushing them in good faith.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act regarding the crime at issue [this cannot be viewed as self-defense or legitimate act because the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the act of violence constitutes self-defense or legitimate act, but did not obstruct or avoid acts of violence but went through a new act of infringement that damages goods.]

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Penalty fine of 200,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence (see, e.g., Article 59(1)1 of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2001Da11448, Apr. 1, 201) (see, 201; Supreme Court Decision 201Da11448, Apr. 2, 201);