logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2019.10.24 2019가단3138
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 59,100,000, and its annual amount from April 19, 2019 to May 31, 2019, and its annual amount.

Reasons

1. On June 20, 2018, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant on the steel frame, board, metal hold, and glass construction work, and performed the said construction work. However, the Plaintiff sought payment of the unpaid construction cost as the Defendant did not pay only KRW 30,00,000 out of the construction cost agreed upon to the Plaintiff, and the remainder is not paid. 2. Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of the Act on the Civil Procedure (i.e., Supreme Court Decision 208(3)2 of the applicable provisions of the Act (i.e., the Defendant only raised a formal objection after receiving the original copy of the instant payment order, and the Defendant did not submit a specific response, and at the first date for pleading, the Defendant’s legal representative presented a reply to the Plaintiff after confirming the amount to be paid to the Plaintiff. However, the Plaintiff’s legal representative was absent at the second date for pleading without submitting a reply thereafter, and thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion is deemed as a confession under

arrow