1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On July 7, 2015, the Plaintiff applied for refugee status to the Defendant on July 15, 2015, while entering the Republic of Ghana (hereinafter referred to as “A”) with a short-term visit visa (C-3) and staying there.

On October 28, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition to deny the Plaintiff’s application for refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute “a well-founded fear of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Refugee Convention and Article 1 of the Refugee Protocol.

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on November 17, 2015, but the said objection was dismissed on March 23, 2016.

【인정근거】다툼 없는 사실, 갑제1 내지 4호증, 을제1, 2호증의 각 기재 이 사건 처분의 적법 여부 원고의 주장 원고는 마을 왕의 요리사로 근무하였는데 왕의 아내와 아들이 독살되는 사건이 발생하여 범죄용의자로 �기고 있다.

Therefore, the defendant's disposition of this case which did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee is unlawful even though the possibility that the plaintiff might be stuffed due to the above circumstances is high in case the plaintiff returned to Ghana.

Judgment

The grounds for applying for refugee status asserted by the Plaintiff are private ties or personal crimes, and the issue that the Plaintiff ought to be resolved by a virtual or judicial system, and it does not constitute a ground for recognition of refugee status under the Refugee Act in itself.

In addition, the defendant's disposition of this case is legitimate, since there are no circumstances to deem that the plaintiff has a well-founded fear of persecution in addition to the entries of Eul evidence No. 3 and the purport of the whole pleadings.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.