Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:50 on October 29, 2019, the Defendant reported 112 to the effect that he was at the time of the above main station “C,” and the police officer belonging to the Samj Police Station, who was at the above main station “C, was able to commit an act of breathing,” the Defendant fleded.

Since then, the Defendant expressed a son who gets away from 100 meters away from the above place of F (50 years of age) in front of the victim, and the above police officer, “I am scling”, and she saw the victim as “I am scling,” and she saw the victim’s scam as drinking once.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases, and at the same time, the Defendant placed a scke wall with a sckele that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A copy of the service log of the 112 reported case handling statement and the e box; and

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Part concerning rejection of prosecution under Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, at around 01:20 on October 29, 2019, demanded the victim D (the 19-year-old) (the 19-year-old) who was an employee of the Defendant to drink alcohol at “C” main points located in C, and then, demanded the victim D (the 19-year-old employee) to engage in the second (sexual traffic) of drinking alcohol, but the victim refused such demand. However, around 01:45 on the same day, the Defendant expressed the victim’s bath at the front of the 01:45 on the same day, and 10 times the victim’s clothes.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. Judgment on applicable provisions of Acts: Judgment dismissing the written agreement submitted to the court after the institution of public prosecution is instituted for a violation of Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act: