1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, along with B, tried to arrange sexual traffic by employing C after having interview with C, which is a female sexual traffic, and allowing many male customers to engage in sexual traffic.

On March 17, 2016, the Defendant received 130,000 won from male customers in the same Gu as Daegu Suwon-gu Droud 203 and 205, and had C, an employee of sexual traffic, engage in sexual intercourse at around 18 times in total, as shown in the list of crimes, from March 24, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with B to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning C and B;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Voluntary submission, written waiver of ownership, records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each report on internal investigation and its accompanying documents (No. 16 through 21, 23 through 27, 30 of the evidence list);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - No criminal punishment other than fines on two occasions - Other factors such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, health conditions, home environment, motive, means, consequence, etc., shall be taken into account.