A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The defendant shall be liable for damages of KRW 12,400,000 to the applicant E.

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 776]

1. On February 2, 2016, the criminal defendant against the victim C shall work for the victim C at the financial company of J in Seoul and the original state, within the I car page located in H, Gangwon-si, Gangwon-do.

The principal and interest will be repaid within 2-3 months from the lending of money with the loan.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the Defendant borrowed the above money for consumption of expenses for travel, living expenses, and expenses for the purchase of clothes at department stores in Jeju-do, and the Defendant did not have any specific property and do not have any income from university students at the convenience store at present, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money even if he borrowed the above money from the injured party.

The Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; and (b) around that time, the victim had the victim take out a loan of KRW 10 million from the Sejong Savings Bank; (c) KRW 5 million from the Intern Savings Bank; (d) KRW 3 million from the Taebudy loan; and (e) KRW 21 million from the Cho Llodyt to KRW 3 million; and (e) around February 3, 2016, the Defendant provided the Defendant with KRW 15 million from the Agricultural Co., Ltd. counter, which is in the Gangwon-si Opening movement of Gangwon-si, and KRW 6 million from the LTM equipment in the same city, around February 3, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On April 4, 2016, the Defendant against the victim D is the president of the J-Financial Company in Seoul and the Republic of Korea.

When lending money with the loan, interest and principal will be repaid within 2 to 3 months.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any particular property, and there is no sufficient revenue from the current university student to the convenience store, so even if he borrowed the above money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to repay the borrowed money.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and caused the victim to smart.