1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

3. Of the purport of the judgment of the court of first instance, “the claim” is stated.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the ground for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the following is added to the fourth and tenth parts of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) such ground is cited as it is in accordance with

In addition, the Plaintiff’s statement that a confidential local organization called DB died of the Plaintiff’s mother by committing a permanent attack is merely an abstract side, and it is difficult to accept the Plaintiff’s statement in itself contrary to the common sense and the empirical rule.

Considering that the Plaintiff was unmarried at the time of applying for refugee status, but was married at the time of refugee interview and made contradictory statements, it is difficult to readily conclude that the Plaintiff’s statement that a confidential local organization threatened the Plaintiff with murder after the Plaintiff’s mother’s death is credibility.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

However, the purport of the judgment of the court of first instance that " May 8, 2018" is obvious that it is a clerical error in the text of " May 8, 2019", and such amendment shall be corrected.