The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable. 2. Although this court did not have any record of being punished for a similar type of crime against the defendant, it appears that the court of first instance has determined the punishment by fully considering these circumstances. In addition, considering the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive for the instant crime, means and consequence of the instant crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., it is difficult to view that the fine imposed by the court of first instance is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion disputing this point cannot be accepted.

3. According to the conclusion, Defendant’s appeal is not accepted under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Provided, That under Article 25 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, “the choice of laws and regulations” and “the selection of fines” shall be deleted ex officio pursuant to Article 25 of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.