logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.05.15 2013고정5183
상해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 1, 2013, at around 01:05, Defendant B and the victim A had sexual intercourse with Defendant B in front of the 'F' restaurant located in the Busan Northern-gu, Busan, on the ground that the victim abuseds the female her female f, Defendant B followed the victim A by hand, and then, Defendant B got off the part of the victim A with both hand and turned out the victim A’s neck over the ground floor by pushing the victim’s fry, and turned out the victim’s fys of the fys, thereby making it impossible to know the number of days of treatment to the victim A.

2. Defendant A, at the same time and at the same place as in the preceding paragraph, was assaulted by the victim B, and was in possession of it against the victim B, the Defendant A put the victim B’s knife knife knife knife knife knife with which the number of treatment days cannot be known to the victim B at one time.

Summary of Evidence

Facts No. 1

1. A’s legal statement;

1. Investigation report (limited to attachment of a photograph of a CCTV for crime prevention) ;

1. Facts set forth in Article 2 of the Judgment of the upper part of the suspect A;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning B;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing shot photographs, such as suspect B's upper parts and photographs;

1. Relevant provisions concerning criminal facts and the Defendants’ choice of punishment: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendants and defense counsel on the assertion of Defendant and defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserted that each act constitutes a justifiable act that does not violate social norms, and thus, it does not constitute a crime.

According to the records, the defendants are recognized as having actively inflicted an attack during the process of paying trial expenses, so it does not violate the social rules.

arrow