logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2016.09.01 2015가단10118
약속어음금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly combine with the Plaintiff KRW 150,000,000 and with respect thereto, from August 12, 2015 to February 1, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On April 30, 2015, D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) issued, to Defendant B, an electronic promissory note (hereinafter “instant promissory note”) with an amount equivalent to KRW 150 million (hereinafter “instant promissory note”) as the number E and the due date August 11, 2015, the Daegu Bank’s two branches of the payment place and the payment place, and the amount of the promissory note (hereinafter “instant promissory note”).

순번 배서인 배서일자 부가조건 1 피고 B 2015. 5. 26. 없음 2 주식회사 퓨전비즈 2015. 5. 27. 무담보배서 3 주식회사 서정하이테크 2015. 6. 1. 무담보배서 4 주식회사 우진투자기획 2015. 6. 2. 없음 5 주식회사 퓨전비즈 2015. 6. 2. 무담보배서 6 주식회사 굿펠라스 2015. 6. 10 무담보배서 7 피고 주식회사 웰파트너스(이하 ‘피고 회사’) 2015. 6. 11. 없음 8 피고 C 2015. 6. 18. 없음 9 F 2015. 6. 18. 무담보배서 10 엔에프씨 주식회사 2015. 6. 18. 무담보배서 11 동성산업 2015. 6. 19. 없음

B. The Promissory Notes in this case are delivered in sequential order as indicated below, and finally, the same-sex industry (hereinafter “same-sex industry”) in the same-sex industry (hereinafter “same-sex industry”) delivered the Promissory Notes in this case to the Plaintiff on June 19, 2015, and the Plaintiff currently holds the Promissory Notes in its possession as follows:

C. On August 11, 2015, the Plaintiff presented the instant promissory note to the dong Branch of the Daegu Bank. However, the Plaintiff was denied payment.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1-1 and 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the facts of the determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendants, who are the endorsers of the Promissory Notes, are jointly liable to pay the Plaintiff, the final holder of the Promissory Notes, the amount of KRW 150 million, as well as damages for delay.

B. Determination 1 on the Defendants’ defenses, etc. 1) Determination on the Defendants’ assertion is as follows: (a) Defendant B’s husband G operated H under the name of the said Defendant; (b) the issuer of the Promissory Notes in this case.

arrow