Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 50,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 3, 2017, the Defendant driven B Obaon around 11:02, and led D elementary school front of D elementary school in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to D elementary school from the apartment side.

Since there is a crosswalk in which signal apparatus is installed at a front door, a person engaged in driving service is required to drive in accordance with the new code, but the red signal B, which is a stop signal, was cut off in violation of the signal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Application of enforcement manual statutes;

1. Article 156 of the relevant Act and Articles 156 subparagraph 1 and 5 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. On the Defendant’s assertion of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the Defendant asserts that there was no violation of the signal since the Defendant reported the green straight-line signal from the front direction of the Defendant’s proceeding at the time of the instant case.

According to the evidence examined above, F of a traffic control police officer was consistent from an investigative agency to this court, and the defendant was living in the creh of pedestrian signals in accordance with the pedestrian signals, and the defendant was living in the creh of pedestrian signals, and controlled by the traffic signal violation.

At the time, two police officers were present to witness the defendant's signal violation scene and there was no need to provide evidence by using a black box, etc. separately.

The defendant's above assertion is not accepted, since his statement may be reliable.