The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. At around 21:40 on June 11, 2013, the Defendant used the victim’s desire to take care of his/her head when he/she saw the victim’s head at a time when he/she met with the victim C (at the age of 24) following the victim C (at the age of 24).

B. At around 01:00 on October 3, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the victim at the time of three times the victim’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.

2. Determination:

A. The prosecutor presented the prosecutor’s evidence that contains the statements of the victims as evidence proving the facts charged against the defendant, photographs taken by the CCTV images near the site at the time, and submitted various investigation reports.

However, among the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the remaining evidence, excluding the statements of the victims, does not have taken the form of each of the crimes of this case at the scene of the crime, and furthermore, it does not have taken the investigation of persons who have observed the scene of the crime, and such evidence alone does not directly prove the defendant's crime.

Most of the investigation reports also indicate the process that the police officer in charge of the investigation expresses that the defendant is a criminal offender, and thus, they seem to be merely the opinion of the police officer in charge of the case.

On the other hand, the statements by the victims of each of the crimes of this case can be direct evidence.

In this regard, health care unit and the victim F showed the face of the offender at the time of damage, and the offender makes a statement in this court that he/she is the defendant.

Furthermore, the defendant is not himself/herself, or on June 11, 2013.