Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) of the original judgment (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is reasonable to take into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is divided and reflected; (b) the Defendant suffers from stimulative disorder; and (c) the Defendant appears to have committed contingent crimes.

However, the crime of this case was committed on the ground that the defendant did not return part of accommodation expenses, and the defendant was damaged by walking the door of the room, and the victim's fingers entered the crepit, making the visit, cutting the victim's fingers, cutting the victim's fingers, and attempted to intrude into the room, which is not good to the nature of the crime, and the elderly's victim suffered serious injury requiring five weeks' treatment, which is not agreed with the victim, was not recovered, and there was no agreement with the victim, and the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case even during the period of repeated crime, and in particular, even during the period of repeated crime, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable in full view of all the sentencing conditions such as age, health, character and behavior, environment, means and result of the crime, and the situation before and after the crime.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.