logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.04.26 2015가단25050
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 30,596,00 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from April 13, 2016 to the date of complete payment.

Reasons

1. 청구원인에 관한 판단 갑 제2, 3, 4호증의 각 기재에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하면, 원고는 2013. 3.경부터 2015. 9. 4.까지 피고에게 지육(脂肉)을 공급한 사실, 위 거래기간 미지급 지육대금은 30,596,000원인 사실을 인정할 수 있으므로, 피고는 원고에게 30,596,000원과 이에 대하여 원고가 구하는 바에 따라 이 사건 변론 종결 다음 날인 2016. 4. 13.부터 다 갚는 날까지 소송촉진 등에 관한 특례법에 정해진 연 15%의 비율로 계산한 지연손해금을 지급할 의무가 있다.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. Defendant’s assertion 1) On October 27, 2015, the Plaintiff seized the Defendant’s deposit claim with the Ulsan District Court 2015Kadan3198, as the preserved claim. 2) On January 19, 2016, the Defendant deposited KRW 30,596,000 with the Ulsan District Court 203Da303 on January 19, 2016. On January 25, 2016, the provisional attachment of the claim was revoked as the Ulsan District Court 1016Kao30 on January 25, 2016.

3) Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim should be dismissed. (B) The facts alleged in the Defendant’s above-mentioned 1-2 are significant facts in this court, or are recognized by the evidence Nos. (1) and (2). However, in light of the following circumstances, the Defendant, who is the obligor of provisional seizure, deposits at sea, alone does not recognize the validity of the repayment of the obligation, and thus, the Defendant’s claim is not accepted. (i) The Defendant’s claim for payment of the deposit money deposited at provisional seizure is not allowed, and the obligor’s claim for recovery of the deposit money

2) In other words, even if a creditor of provisional attachment receives a final and conclusive judgment in favor of the merits, he/she may not directly claim the withdrawal of the deposit, and may recover the deposit by receiving a cash order (an assignment order, an order of collection) issued by the executing court with respect to the debtor of provisional attachment’s right to claim the withdrawal of the deposit amount (see Supreme Court Order 95Ma252, Nov. 11, 1996). However, the creditor of provisional attachment may recover the deposit.

arrow