beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The Defendant in the facts charged of the instant case is a person who was engaged in activities in an emergency countermeasure committee, which is the president of the B Housing Association, which is the president of the B Housing Association, and D is a person who supported the said emergency countermeasure committee’s affairs.
The Defendant, under the initiative of the Emergency Countermeasure Committee, announced that a cooperative general meeting will be held on December 6, 2015 while preparing for new election of the heads and executive officers of the cooperative. However, on November 28, 2015, when the number of union members who will agree with the holding or resolution of the cooperative general meeting falls short of the quorum, D shall instruct D to forge the written consent to hold and written resolution at the meeting of the union members for the purpose of holding or resolution of the union general meeting, and D shall, according to its instruction, keep D, from December 2, 2015 to April of the same month, using the list of union members, forged the written consent to hold the special meeting of union members and written resolution at the office of the Emergency Countermeasure Committee in the E-si located from December 2, 2015, and combined it with the written consent to hold the general meeting and the written resolution to hold the said written consent to hold the general meeting, as if it were submitted on December 6, 2015.
At the end of this month, the letter of consent to hold an extraordinary general meeting of members of I from December 2, 2014 to December 4, 2012, 12.2, 2014, and the letter of consent to hold a special meeting of members of JJ 3, Dong Dong-dong 2, JJ 3, Dong-dong 4, Dong Dong-dong 2
2. Determination
A. The burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial lies on the prosecutor, and the finding of guilt must be based on the evidence of probative value that makes the judge feel true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, the defendant is suspected of guilty, even if there is no such evidence.
Even the defendant.