1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the cases being cited or added as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or added parts] Part 3rd part of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter “theme park of this case”) “G theme park” in Part 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter “theme park of this case”) with “family experience theme park of this case” (hereinafter “theme park of this case”).

The following shall be added to the 4th 11th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th) of the first th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th.).

In light of the facts acknowledged in the above-mentioned paragraph (2) above, I re-appealed to the Supreme Prosecutors' Office, but the Supreme Prosecutors' Office dismissed the re-appeal above on August 2018, the Supreme Prosecutors' Office dismissed the re-appeal as follows: 6th to 20th to 7th [the part of paragraph (3) at the 6th sentence] of the first instance judgment. 3] In light of the facts acknowledged in the above-mentioned paragraph (2), the evidence submitted by the plaintiff, including the facts acknowledged in the above-mentioned paragraph (1) and the evidence submitted by the plaintiff up to the trial, including the evidence Nos. 59, 68, and 69, constitutes a breach of trust against the plaintiff.

In so doing, the Defendants breached their duty of care as a good manager.