logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2016.04.08 2016고정27
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates alcoholic beverage manufacturing business under the trade name called the “C” in the Gangwon-Haak-gun B.

No person shall make a false indication of origin or make an indication that may cause confusion as to the origin.

Nevertheless, from June 12, 2015 to July 29, 2015, the Defendant purchased 3,000 km rice from the static military office from the above C’s workplace from around June 12, 2015, and manufactured 5,400 litress of rice with 1,280 km among them, and sold 2,80 litress of 5,40 litress of rice, and made a false indication of origin with the indication of “10 % of the name of the raw material” on the Sgress of Sgress of Sgres.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing evidence photographs;

1. Article 14 and Article 6 (1) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 14 and 6 (1) 1 of the same Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on the following factors: (a) the grounds for sentencing of the instant crime; (b) the profits acquired by the Defendant; (c) the amount of business place; and (d) the circumstances before and after the commission of the instant crime; and (d) the punishment as ordered is determined by comprehensively taking account of

arrow