logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.08.26 2016고단4506
대기환경보전법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of five thousand won, respectively.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B A Co., Ltd. is a corporation established for the purpose of household production and wholesale retail, etc., and Defendant A is a representative of in-house director of B Co., Ltd.

1. A person who intends to install at least 15 km of a power-driven facility, which is a defendant A-emitting facility, shall file a report on the installation of a atmospheric emission facility with the competent authority;

From around June 14, 2013 to June 14, 2016, the Defendant, at the place of business located in Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, and without reporting to the competent authorities, engaged in the manufacturing of households using one straw of 30kW sand (ma facilities) and one straw of 22kW, which is a power-generating facility of 30kW.

2. Defendant B, in relation to the Defendant’s business at the above date, time, and place, Defendant B, without reporting to the competent authority, operated a business of manufacturing households using air pollutants-emitting facilities installed without reporting to the competent authority.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing violations;

1. Defendant A: Article 90 subparag. 1 of the atmospheric environment conservation Act and Article 23(1) of the same Act (or choice of imprisonment), Defendant B: Articles 95, 90 subparag. 1, and 23(1) of the atmospheric environment conservation Act;

1. Defendant A who is subject to suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A of a community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc.;

1. Defendant B corporation of the provisional payment order: The Defendants’ crime on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is an act that causes broad damage and causes considerable social expenses; Defendant A had the record of being sentenced to a fine twice due to the same kind of crime even before the instant case; Defendant both recognized the crime and endeavor to prevent recurrence.

The point stated in this Court and the age, occupation, sex, environment, family relationship, motive for the commission of the crime and the consequences of the defendant;

arrow