logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.08.29 2013가단43859
구상금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A’s KRW 39,744,590 as well as 5% per annum from November 29, 2013 to August 29, 2014.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The relevant Plaintiff is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with respect to the C motor vehicle owned by B (hereinafter “Plaintiff-motor vehicle”).

The defendant further accident insurance company (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant company") is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to D vehicles owned by the defendant A (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant vehicle").

On December 22, 2012, Defendant A paid the occurrence of traffic accidents and the insurance money of the Plaintiff, driving the Defendant vehicle at around 221:20, and driving the Defendant vehicle in the direction of KTS in the direction of the peace road at the front of the electric week, and the effect automatic 1 in the front of the LG failure road at the front of the LG failure road at the front of the five-lane, found that the vehicle in the French signal at the left at the same direction (hereinafter referred to as “motor vehicle changing the lane”) entered the two-lanes for the first time.

On the other hand, a white solid line is set between one lane and two lanes.

In order to avoid the collision with the vehicle changing the lane, Defendant A operated the hand Hand rapidly to the right side, and changed the lane to the third way, and the left side of the Plaintiff A, who is in the same direction as the wind, was shocked on the left side of the vehicle.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was at the center and left left, and the front part of Nonparty E’s F Driving and the rear part of Nonparty G Driving who stops in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle, which was sent at the same direction on the left-hand left-hand side, and there was an accident that reconcepts the rear part of Nonparty I’s J Driving in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front (hereinafter “instant accident”).

Accordingly, Nonparty K, L, and L suffered from the injury requiring medical treatment between two or three weeks, such as the lue base or the lue base, on the Plaintiff’s vehicle, the F vehicle, H vehicle, and J vehicle, respectively.

Plaintiff

On June 2013, the Plaintiff, an insurance company of the vehicle, shall be the victims of the instant accident, such as K, L, E, G, and I.

arrow