Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 24, 1983, the defendant reported the marriage with the victim C on February 24, 198, and was divorced on April 4, 1998.

The Defendant, while the Defendant was economically difficult from March to April 2017, demanded the payment of money to the victim with the knowledge of the economically limited circumstances, but was denied from the victim. As such, the Defendant arbitrarily prepared a document as if the Defendant had a claim to receive money from the victim, and tried to submit the document as evidence of the civil procedure while filing a civil lawsuit against the victim.

1. Forging a private document;

A. On March 27, 1998, each of the following persons: on March 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) entered the title “C” using a computer without authority for the purpose of exercising the aforementioned right at a non-permanent place; (b) entered the name “D” into the name “C” and then made it possible for the husband to carry on a mixed business with the husband A for three years, and then re-enters it after three years; (c) the cost of living was 1 million won per month; (d) made a notarized by the husband; and (e) made a divorce by 5 million won per month; and (e) made a divorce by the her husband only on the documents; and (e) entered the contents “C” into the name “C” and then made a prior entry into the name “C”.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a letter in C, a private document on the duty of rights.

B. On November 14, 2008, each of the following reasons: the Defendant: (a) on March 14, 2017 to April 2008, using a computer without authority for the purpose of exercising the aforementioned right at a non-permanent location, and, without authority, the Defendant is responsible and guaranteed for the Defendant’s work and business so that “the Defendant has divorced by agreement with the husband, who is the husband, is responsible for and brought up the right of fostering the child F, who is a single-style F, and F will be sent if the Plaintiff is inter-universityed to the university; and (b) the Defendant is also responsible for and guaranteed the Defendant’s work and business so that F may lead a smooth marital life by marriage.

If so,