Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 2013, 2013, around 20:00, Defendant A purchased and acquired stolen goods via E with knowledge of the fact that a total of 39 mobile phones, including S3 mobile phones, were known that D’s market price in the mutual infinite coffee shop located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, was equivalent to 900,000 won.

2. Defendant B

A. On February 16, 2013, at around 16:00, the Defendant arranged for the acquisition of stolen goods by hearing the horses that he/she had found a place where 39 cell phoness can dispose of stolen mobile phones from D in the mutual infinite coffee shop located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and by informing the contact information of the above A.

B. The Defendant, on August 2015, was on the first floor office in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City F and the first floor office in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

G There is a lost philop, and you see the Request.

At the gallon jum of “S6 mobile phone ( model name: SM-G920S, serial number: H) with the knowledge of the fact that it is a stolen property, it purchased 250,000 won and acquired stolen property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. A protocol concerning partial examination of the police officers in relation to G;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Application of statutes regarding galloning of seized records and lists of seized articles, and photographs and photographs;

1. Article 362(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 362(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 362(1) (the occupation of acquiring stolens) of the Criminal Act; Article 362(2) and Article 362(1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of arranging the acquisition of stolens); and the choice of fines;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (defendant B), the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, each of the Defendants’ detention in a workhouse

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the confessions and reflects of crimes, Defendant A did not have any criminal records exceeding the same kind of criminal records and fines, Defendant B was the initial offender, and other Defendants’ age, sexual conduct.