logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.02.13 2014고합429
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)
Text

1. The defendant is not guilty. 2. The summary of the judgment of this case shall be notified publicly.

3. An application for remedy by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed;

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the representative director of Ansan and mobile phone case processing company F (hereinafter “F”).

F From around 200 to Germany’s OBE, while it was supplied with a 13,4150,000 won in 205 as the transaction performance has decreased, it entered deficit amounting to 2006, and 200 million won in 2006, and entered the type of business conversion to the mobile phone case processing business due to the difficulties in the management of the company, and entered into the production contract with G, which is the first cooperation company in Samsung Electronic, for six months from September 2006, and 99,000 won in its development (hereinafter “H machinery”) but it was produced for the purpose of the original mobile phone processing, and it was unreasonable for the Defendant to convert it to the mobile phone case processing work, and therefore, the Defendant cooperateed with the 15% of the defective supply and demand rate of the SH-D model from around September 2006 to around November 2006 to cooperate with the 25% of the average of the 15% of the defective supply and demand rate of the H model.

In addition, the mobile phone parts processing market is divided into the first collaborative company registered as a collaborative company that directly engages in delivery transactions with the two companies, and the first collaborative company and the second collaborative company, which receives a certain quantity of goods from the first collaborative company, and the second collaborative company, which supplies them to the first collaborative company, so it is almost impossible to hold a large amount of goods as long as the first collaborative company is not the first collaborative company. Therefore, even the victim D, C, and the same business, the Samsung Electronic or LB mobile phone case is also from the victim D, Samsung Electronic, or LB mobile phone.

arrow