Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 400,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On July 2, 2015, the Defendant leased to the victim (D) his own building (No. 101) located in Ansan-si, the 16:00 Simsan-si.

However, while the leased victim (D) uses the monthly rent of one million won per month for the purpose of the office for three months, the accused infringed on the above office by using Maki without permission.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Legal statement of E;

1. Application of the front entrance photographs, and the rear entrance photographs and the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 319 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant interfered with the victim's exercise of rights so that the victim may not enter the office without paying monthly rent even after the victim intrudes on his residence by the same method as the date and time as stated in the facts charged in the facts charged in the judgment, and at the same place as indicated in the judgment.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

① As the victim did not pay monthly rent, the Defendant replaced the correction device in front of the instant store.

② At the time of leasing the instant store, the Defendant issued only the back key to the victim.

③ The victim: (a) opened the back of the instant store and used the instant store by setting up a device to correct the front door inside the store; and (b) did not make a separate key to the instant store or replace the device to correct the front door.

4. The victim was that the defendant had changed all the corrective devices at the two entrances of the store of this case by the investigative agency.

When filing a complaint, the store of this case.