logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.02.03 2015가합69986
임금
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff A, KRW 204,567,916; and (b) against Plaintiff B, KRW 173,494,857; and (c) with respect to each of the said amounts, November 11, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 21, 2009, the Defendant is an association established to promote an urban development project, etc. in the Dong-si population D and the same Gu E, etc. from June 2, 201, Plaintiff A served as the head of the Defendant association from June 2, 201, and Plaintiff B served as Defendant director from January 5, 2012.

B. On October 14, 2013, the Defendant made a resolution to suspend the execution of duties as the president of the Plaintiff’s partnership (hereinafter “resolution of the board of directors on October 14, 2013”) with the consent of all the directors present at the meeting, on the ground that the Plaintiff A, the president of the partnership, does not comply with the articles of association, and carries out duties by abusing authority such as nullifying the board of directors and the board of representatives (hereinafter “resolution of the board of directors”).

Then, on October 29, 2013, the Defendant held a board of representatives to suspend the performance of duties as the president of the Plaintiff’s partnership and made a resolution to appoint F as an acting president of the partnership (hereinafter “resolution of the board of representatives on October 29, 2013”).

C. Since then, on October 30, 2013, F entered a cooperative office managed by the Plaintiffs, with G and H, etc., and obstructed the Plaintiffs’ association’ business affairs by having the key repair business entity cover the lock-up system of the entrance of the cooperative room, etc., the Plaintiff A leased the office to G around the early December 2013, the address population I.

On April 8, 2014, the defendant held an extraordinary general meeting and dismissed the plaintiff A from the office of the head of the defendant's association while 178 members present on April 8, 2014, and called "resolution of an extraordinary general meeting on April 8, 2014".

A. Before 200:

E. On April 22, 2014, the Plaintiffs filed a provisional disposition against the Defendant and J, including the suspension of the validity of the resolution of the extraordinary general meeting as of April 8, 2014, the Suwon District Court Decision 2014Kahap1043, and the suspension of the validity of the resolution of the extraordinary general meeting as of April 8, 2014, which seeks to suspend the performance of duties as the president of the J’s association. However, the said court rendered a ruling of dismissal on July 8, 2014, and filed a complaint against the said ruling of dismissal.

arrow