A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates the CF in Chang-gun B in Jeon Chang-gun, and is the business owner of the extraction of pine trees conducted from D to 5 February 27, 2020, and is responsible for the safety and health of workers.

On February 2, 2020, the Defendant directed the victim E (the aged 74) who is his employee to extract pine trees at the above mining site, around 15:54 on February 22, 2020.

At the time, in order to extract pine trees (the height 12.5m, weight 2.7t), the work was well-known around the roots of the relevant pine trees as poscule, and it was in a state where the tree business operators were laid on the spot the pine trees that were trying to excavate by demanding that they interfere with the lumbering and discontinue extraction. In such a case, there was a situation where the strong wind has a strong wind, the person engaged in the extraction of pine trees should not go beyond the above pine trees, prevent the workers from entering the place where the above pine trees are likely to go beyond the above pine trees, and there was a duty of care to prepare a work plan, such as paying safety mother to workers, suspending work, and preparing a work plan.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, who did not take safety measures, such as putting the said pine trees in a tank, prohibiting entry into the place where the said pine trees are located, had the victim of the debt, who was staying in the vicinity of the said pine trees, mine up the said pine trees, conduct field adjustment, etc., and accordingly, had the victim, who was in the vicinity of the said pine trees cover the said pine trees, which were used for a cause of fire

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of a victim due to occupational negligence as above and caused the death of his/her employees by failing to take measures under the Occupational Safety and Health Act at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. A corpse of corpse;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A sales contract;