beta
Text
1. Defendant B’s KRW 50,000,000 per annum for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from May 30, 2016 to June 28, 2018.
Reasons
1. Facts which have no dispute over a basic fact [based for recognition], entries in Gap evidence 1, 2, 3, and 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings;
A. The plaintiff is a partner of defendant B.
B. On October 12, 2013, Defendant B purchased the ESF (hereinafter “instant apartment”), and completed the registration of ownership transfer as the receipt No. 78474 on November 18, 2013, from Suwon District Court Sung-nam Branch of the Sungwon District Court, Sung-nam Branch of the Gwangju District Court (hereinafter “instant apartment”).
C. Thereafter, on October 27, 2016, Defendant B sold the instant apartment to Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) and Defendant C completed the registration of ownership transfer as the receipt of No. 79186, Oct. 28, 2016, on the ground that the instant apartment was sold on October 27, 2016.
2. Judgment as to the main claim and the conjunctive claim claim No. 1
가. 주장의 요지 1) 이 사건 아파트는 D로부터 원고와 피고 B가 공동으로 매수하면서 원고의 1/2 지분을 피고 B에게 명의신탁하였던 것인데, 원고는 2016. 5. 30. 피고 B로부터 이 사건 아파트에 관한 피고 B의 1/2 지분을 자신이 매수하기로 하면서 피고 B에게 계약금 명목으로 5,000만 원을 지급하였다. 2) 그런데, 피고 B는 피고 C의 대표이사인 G(피고 B의 조카사위이다)과 공모하여, 원고의 이 사건 아파트의 1/2 지분 상당액인 8,500만 원과 위와 같이 피고 B에게 지급한 5,000만 원, 합계 1억 3,500만 원을 가로챌 목적으로 이 사건 아파트를 피고 C 앞으로 소유권이전등기를 마침으로써, 원고에게 위 금원 상당의 손해를 입혔다.
3) Home affairs and even if the Defendants’ joint tort is not recognized, Defendant B’s arbitrary disposal of the instant apartment to Defendant C, and the Plaintiff suffered loss of the Plaintiff’s right to share 1/2 of the instant apartment. On the other hand, Defendant B obtained the benefit of the amount equivalent to the 1/2 share of the instant apartment. 4) Accordingly, the Defendants jointly dispose of it to the Plaintiff.