A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is between the victim B (the age of 58) and the relative who had been aware of for at least ten years.

At around 23:00 on April 15, 2019, the Defendant sought to add both alcohol to drinking while drinking alcohol with drinking alcohol within the “Dju” located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., and assaulted the victim B, on the ground that the victim B Daa and met it, on the ground that the Defendant Daa and the Defendant met the Defendant, and that the victim B was drinking up to the floor of the victim’s left eye and the head part of the victim’s body twice, and that the victim’s body was flicked on several occasions.

As a result, the Defendant committed serious injury to the victim, such as the closure of the details of the sub-brain connection which requires treatment for about six months or more, or the brain color by the compromise.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Statements made by witnesses B in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the police against the accused (1, 2 times);

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A report on internal investigation (Attachment to emergency medical services log), a report on internal investigation (Attachment to a medical opinion), and a medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a internal investigation report (to attach on-site CCTV images), CCTV images, CDs, and investigation reports (to verify CCTV images taken on the surface of the pan-crime);

1. Article 258 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. There is no causal relationship between the Defendant’s assault and the victim’s “influence of the facts charged”.

2. In light of the following facts and circumstances revealed by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it is reasonable to view that the brain color of the victim caused by the victim was due to the assault committed by the defendant several times when the head and face of the victim was involved.

Therefore, the defendant and defense counsel are not accepted.

A. The Defendant is the victim from an investigative agency to this court.