logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.11.01 2018고정157
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, while residing in Suwon-gu B lending in Busan, experienced conflicts with employees at the construction site of new construction due to infringement of view rights due to the construction of neighboring buildings. On June 28, 2017, at the construction site around 18:25, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim C ( South and 34 years old), who is an employee, at the construction site, on the part of the victim, on the part of the victim's buckbucks, caused the victim's injury, such as dives, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment by drinking the part of the bucks.

2. The Defendant of intimidation by phone call to the victim on July 1, 2017, and thrown away the victim from the scene of “to die before the Plaintiff’s house and to die in the eye.”

“Intimidating the victim”, the victim was threatened.

3. The Defendant, at the front of the construction site around July 2017, tried to make a police station known to the victim as “picking due to collapse,” and will make up for the principle of mutatis mutandis taxation and mutatis mutandis taxation.

“In doing so,” the victim batddddd the bat and batdd the chest part of the victim several times.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that each legal statement C, D, E, and F (in relation to the crime No. 1 of the facts constituting the crime, only supporting the victim’s bucks, and there is no fact that the victim’s bucks’ face face was not taken by drinking, and the victim was not injured, and that the victim’s speech was temporarily displayed without the victim’s intention, and that there is no fact or fact that the victim’s bucks were bucked with bucks related to the crime No. 2 of the crime.

However, comprehensively taking account of the testimony of witnesses including victims C, the defendant can only be aware of the facts sufficient to establish the crime of intimidation in light of the fact that the defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim like the facts of the crime, the fact that the defendant committed assault, and the situation or attitude at the time of telephoneing to the victim.

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Mobile phone image recorded on a mobile phone;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the point of injuring the option of punishment against the crime: The point of intimidation under Article 257 (1) (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act: Article 283 of the Criminal Act;

arrow