logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.04.05 2018나61275
기타(금전)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and it is recognized that the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are legitimate even if the plaintiff's assertion and evidence submitted in the court

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows: “In the third fifth of the judgment of the court of first instance,” each evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize the fact that the representative director E or C embezzleds the defendant’s funds by means of reducing the defendant’s sales on the financial statements in 2014 and 2015, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.” Thus, it is identical to the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding “no other evidence to acknowledge it.” Thus, it is cited as it is in accordance

2. As such, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow