logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.10.19 2017가단9683
공사대금
Text

1. The defendant,

A. From November 1, 2015, Plaintiffs 42,292,00 won and its related thereto to Plaintiff Jong-gun Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of the claim (1) On September 7, 2015, the Plaintiff Jong-gun Co., Ltd. entered into a subcontract for electrical construction among the construction works of the Defendant and the A Hospital Hospital, with the contract amount of KRW 15 million (including value-added tax) and the construction period until September 30, 2015, and completed the construction work on or around October 20, 2015; (2) on or around October 31, 2015, the Plaintiff Co., Ltd. entered into a subcontract with the Defendant and the A Hospital Street, etc. with the contract amount of KRW 28.6 million (including value-added tax) and completed the construction work on or around October 31, 2015; (3) concluded a subcontract with the Defendant on September 23, 2015; and (4) concluded the subcontract with the Defendant and the A Hospital Hospital No. 1650, Jun. 16, 2015; and (4) concluded the subcontract with the Plaintiff 16060,21606.5.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff's commercial power company 4,36 million won in total, including the electrical construction price of 15 million won and the construction price of 28,66 million won in A Hospital Street Construction Works (=15 million won) and the construction price of 28.6 million won in A Hospital Street Construction Works (=2,8.6 million won), and five million won in total to the plaintiff's New York Co., Ltd. (=7,1.5 million won - 6,5 million won) and damages for delay on each of the above money, unless there are special circumstances.

2. As to the defendant's assertion, the defendant set the rate of the warranty bond as 3% of the contract price at the time of concluding each subcontract with the defendant, and the plaintiffs did not deliver the warranty bond under each of the above subcontract to the defendant, so the defendant is therefore.

arrow