1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if each evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, except for the following additions to the statement of opinion set forth in Section 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is acceptable to accept it according to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(5) The medical staff of the Defendant Hospital changed the Plaintiff’s attitude toward the horizontal course from September 14, 2017 to around 15:36 of the same day of the instant surgery, since the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital changed the work place of the Plaintiff at the time of the instant surgery to the horizontal course in the process of cutting off the part of the work opened by the mini-la omomy outside of the ship, and connecting it with the original abandonment of the work place of the Plaintiff, it cannot be deemed that: (a) from around 09:16, 2017 to around 15:36 of the same day of the instant surgery.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claim of this case shall be dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is justified in its conclusion, the plaintiffs' appeal against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.