All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s punishment (a fine of three million won for each of the defendants) is too unreasonable.

2. At the time of the investigation, Defendant A agreed with the victim K at the time of the investigation. Defendant J agreed with the victim I’s mother at the time of the investigation. Defendant J agreed with the victim A at the time of the judgment of the court below, Defendant J paid 4 million won to Defendant A during the trial of the court below and agreed with the above A at the same time, Defendant A was injured by brain salute, etc. requiring medical treatment for about three weeks due to the instant crime committed by Defendant J at the same time, Defendant A was the perpetrator, and there was no history of criminal punishment prior to the instant crime in the Republic of Korea; Defendant A’s employer and work partner wanted to be the Defendant A, and Defendant J’s mother wanted to be the Defendant’s prior to the instant crime; Defendant A’s employer and work partner wanted to be the Defendant’s wife; and Defendant J’s mother wanted to be the Defendant’

However, in light of the fact that Defendant A reached the left part of the Victim K with salted fish, Defendant J her snife with beerer disease, and the degree of damage is considerably poor, the degree of damage is not less than that of the Defendants, and other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the age, character and conduct, and environment of the Defendants, the punishment of the lower court against the Defendants is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendants' appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, pursuant to Article 25 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, the defendant X in the second sentence No. 5 on the second sentence shall be corrected to "the defendant J" ex officio.