logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.04.03 2017가단78817
명의신탁해지로 인한 주식반한 청구의소
Text

1. It is confirmed that the Plaintiff and the Defendant are the Plaintiff of the shares listed in the separate sheet.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. The facts in the separate sheet of the determination on the cause of the claim do not conflict between the parties.

According to the above facts of recognition, a title trust agreement exists between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the shares listed in the separate sheet. It is recognized that the instant complaint containing the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate the title trust was terminated by being served on the Defendant. Since the Defendant is dissatisfied with this as a reply, the Plaintiff has the interest to seek confirmation on the fact that the said shares are the shareholders

In regard to this, the defendant alleged that he was a beneficial shareholder because he contributed to a certain portion of the company, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this, so the defendant's above assertion is without merit

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and acceptable.

arrow