The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the defendant led to confession of and reflects on the crime of this case. Meanwhile, the crime of this case is serious in light of the degree of taking alcohol level 0.176% and the risk of committing the crime, etc., which was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months and 2 years of suspended execution as the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the time of the crime of this case, which was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months and 2 years of suspended execution, and again commits the crime of this case without any reflector even though they were under suspended execution, it is deemed that there was a history of punishment including imprisonment for the same crime, and all other sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.