beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Fraud;
A. On January 25, 2013, the Defendant loaned money in KRW 12 million to the victim B, who is the head of a high school, at the entrance of the second apartment of Korea located in 1249-4, Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si, 11:00 on January 25, 2013.
“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, the facts were not in progress at the time of divorce lawsuit, and the Defendant did not have any obligation of 36 million won or more as a failure to make an investment, but did not have any property under the name of the Defendant. There was no certain income, and there was no intention or ability to repay the above borrowed money because it was planned to repay the interest on the said money and to use it as a cost of living.
Nevertheless, the defendant was given 1 million won in cash from the injured party, i.e., the borrowed money.
The Defendant, including that, from that time until February 16, 2013, received a total of KRW 1,50,000,000,000 from around six times, as shown in [Attachment] Nos. 1 to 6 of the List of Offenses.
B. The Defendant, at around 10:00 on February 24, 2013, constructed a new house and accommodation building in the Cheongbuk-gun C in the Cheongbuk-gun, Gyeongbuk-gun, Gyeongbuk-do, and carried out the panty project.
The service cost of KRW 27 million is required to lend money. It will be paid together with interest.
“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”
However, the Defendant did not operate a pension project, and the Defendant did not have any obligation of 36 million won or more as an investment failure, but did not have any property under the Defendant’s name. The Defendant did not have any certain income, and was planning to pay interest on the said money and use it as a cost of living. Therefore, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the said borrowed money.
Nevertheless, the defendant is under the name of the defendant, i.e., the defendant's 300,000 won with the agricultural bank account (E) in the name of the defendant's son's son under the name of the victim.