logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.07.05 2018고합200
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant, on October 28, 2014, sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment for a crime in the assistance in Suwon-si District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on July 28, 2015. On January 31, 2018, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced one year and six months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 27, 2018.

[Criminal Facts]

1. Fraud against the victim B;

A. On September 2015, the Defendant was in the office of “D real estate” operated by the victim B in Ansan-si, Masan-si, 2015, and was released from the prison, “A person released from the prison,” and there was no house to live.

It is intended to lend money to the principal office to have him work, and to have the loaned money repaid.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have any special occupation immediately after the release of the prison and did not have any intent or ability to complete payment even if he/she borrowed money from the injured party without any specific property.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 300,000 won in cash from the injured party.

B. On October 2, 2015, the Defendant, at the same place on the same day and around October 2, 2015, would provide the said victim with repayment after one month from lending money, where “the vehicle is required to work, and 2.5 million won is required to purchase the vehicle.”

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have any specific job and did not have any intent or ability to repay the money to the injured party even if he/she borrowed money from the injured party without any specific job after the release of the prison.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 2.5 million won in cash from the injured party.

2. On January 17, 2016, the criminal defendant against the victim F is willing to purchase the vehicle more heavily than the time in his/her office to the victim F, in his/her real estate ‘H located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si.'

On the other hand, a false statement was made to the effect that “as down payment 7.5 million won” was changed.

However, it is true.

arrow