1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant Republic of Korea shall indicate the annexed drawings among the lands listed in the attached Table 2, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 8, 9, 9.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 20, 1990 with respect to the land listed in the attached Table 1, the name of the Defendant Republic of Korea, and with respect to the land listed in the attached Table 2, the name of the Defendant Republic of Korea on February 12, 1997, and with respect to the land listed in the attached Table 3, each registration of preservation of ownership was made in the name of the Defendant Daejeon Metropolitan City on April 16, 201

(hereinafter referred to as "each land listed in the attached Table") shall be abbreviated only by the lot number.

On February 7, 1967, the registration of ownership transfer was made on February 7, 1967 with respect to the land size B B in Jung-gu, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City on the grounds of sale on February 4, 1967. On November 28, 1988, the registration of ownership transfer was made on the ground of sale on November 28, 198 with respect to a part of the seven square meters of land in Jung-gu, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City on the grounds of sale, and the registration of ownership transfer was made on December 3, 198 under the Plaintiff’s name on the ground of sale on September 10, 191. The registration of ownership transfer was made on November 15, 191.

C. At present, building D, E, and F is constructed above the sub-section B of land B and D, E, and F (b).

Since the moving-in report was made on March 11, 1969, the Plaintiff had no change until now.

[Ground of recognition] The entry of Gap's 1 through 10, 15, and Eul's 3, the result of this court's request for surveying and appraisal of the Korea Land Information Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Both claims;

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff purchased the land B, the land listed in the separate sheet, and the buildings of this case from G after the merger on February 4, 1967, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the land B before the annexation on February 7, 1967, and possessed them for not less than 20 years. As such, the period of prescription for acquisition of possession on February 7, 1987 with respect to the land of this case D, E, and part of (b) of F (hereinafter "each land of this case") has expired, and at least on March 11, 1989, the period of prescription for acquisition of possession on each land of this case has expired since March 11, 1989, which was 20 years from March 11, 1969 when the plaintiff moved into the resident registration of this case, the defendants completed the period of prescription for acquisition of possession on each land of this case.