Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On August 16, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to a suspended sentence of eight months for the crime of interference with business at the Changwon District Court’s branch on August 16, 2018. On November 2, 2018, the period of the suspended sentence was determined on February 21, 2019 by the sentence of six months for interference with business at the Changwon District Court’s branch branch, and the sentence of the suspended sentence was invalidated upon the final judgment on February 21, 2019. The period of the parole on October 28, 2019 during the execution of each of the above sentence was expired on December 5, 2019.
1. Around 16:45 on February 6, 2020, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main business by: (a) having been drinking alcohol in D’s operation of the Victim C, the Defendant expressed a bath to the victim, “I wishing to get off the door door, boom, frighter, frighter, frighter, frighter, frighter, nib, fright,” and preventing customers who want to enter the door into the victim’s main store by force of about 30 minutes, thereby obstructing the victim’s main business operation.
2. As the victim F, who was a police officer belonging to the Gando Police Station E zone, sent out after receiving a report of 112 during the time and place set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant abused the victim by openly citing the victim as “the victim f, who was a police officer belonging to the Gando Police Station E zone, is urged to return home,” and the victim’s bitch bitch bitch, rings, franch, franch, franch, franch, franch, and franch bitch, franch bitch,” when the victim
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement concerning C and F;
1. Previous convictions in one decision: Criminal records and investigation reports (verification of criminal records A) are asserted that the defendant does not allow customers who intend to enter into the main place of business to enter.
The obstruction of business is likely to cause the risk of interference with business as an abstract dangerous offender, and the result of interference with business is actually done.