logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2018.08.22 2017가합20230
징계처분무효확인 등
Text

1. It is confirmed that the Defendant’s disposition of reimbursement against the Plaintiff on January 10, 2018 is null and void.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a cooperative which is engaged in the purchase and sale of agricultural products, production guidance business, etc. to members within the jurisdiction of a member of the public city in the public city.

On March 1, 2010, the Plaintiff was appointed as the Defendant’s manager and started to work for the Defendant. From March 25, 2010, the Plaintiff served under the title “business affairs”.

B. On October 10, 201 through October 14, 2016, the Secretariat of the Audit Committee of D Organizations’ Disciplinary Action for D Organizations demanded the Defendant to conduct an audit and inspection, and on December 21, 2016, the Defendant demanded the Defendant to take a disposition of suspension from office for three months of suspension from office, three months of suspension from office, one month of suspension from office for former F, one month of suspension from office for former F, and one month of suspension from office for former F, and one year of suspension from office for former F, and compensation for all of them.

【Disciplinary Reason】

1. Unfair handling of credit sales business;

A. According to Article 9 of the Regulations on the Management of Economic Credit and Article 2 Section 1 of Part II of Part II of the Act on the Management of Economic Credit and Article 5 of Part II of the Act on the Management of Economic Credit, which are the defendant's internal regulations, the credit limit shall be set with the approval of the discretionary authority after fully examining the credit standing of the customer, the existence of security, the sales capacity, and the payment terms and conditions. In the case of credit for security, the credit limit shall be set with the approval of the discretionary authority. In the case of credit for security, the credit limit

b. According to Section 1, Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 4 of Part II of the Economic Credit Business Act, a temporary credit limit shall be granted after considering the transaction partner's credit rating and credit limit amount, transaction records, sales capacity, repayment ability, overdue period, etc. only when there is a need to rapidly increase sales on a temporary basis due to reasons determined by the business process, such as the withdrawal of agricultural products

(w) Sub-Section 1 of Part II, Section 5, Section 1 of Part II, and Section 3 of Part III, of Part II, Act on Credit Business.

arrow