1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

(c) bear 3 per cent of the fees for extension of the loan.

was withdrawn.

C. The Defendant completed the provisional registration of the right to claim transfer of ownership (hereinafter “the provisional registration of this case”) on the ground of the “sale reservation on the same day” under No. 41624, which was received on June 26, 2009, with respect to the instant 6 debt real estate from the Jung-gu District Court High Court, Goyang-gu Branch Office, Goyang Branch Office, the Defendant revoked the registration of the establishment of the second neighboring mortgage on the same day.

1. Indication of real estate: Six real estate in this case;

2. Grounds for provisional registration: Loans, interest, and collateral security, receipt of lease deposit, and other reasons for payment in kind for expenses, which a Eul (which means the plaintiff, hereinafter the same shall apply within the agreement) borrowed from the defendant Gap (which means the defendant, hereinafter the same shall apply in this agreement);

3. Details of the performance amount for Gap to Eul.

(a) Loan amounting to KRW 280,000,000 ( KRW 190,000,000,000,000,000 as KRW 280,000 per month and the remaining KRW 90,000 shall be interest free until May 30, 2010)* In arrears of interest per day 76,00 won per day;

(b) Interest amounting to KRW 40,120 million (interest amounting to KRW 190,000,000 per month);

(c) Handling fees of seven million won;

(e) A bank loan of KRW 380,000,000 (which shall be acquired at the time of gold);

(f) A lease deposit of KRW 90 million (acquisition of a lease deposit for a lessee as at this time);

(g) 30 million won (380 million won x 0.078 x 365 ± 365 ±) on the basis of provisional registration * The remainder of increase or decrease shall be settled at the time of principal registration on the basis of provisional registration;

4. The sales amount should be KRW 820 million, if the sum totaling KRW 810 million is added to the sum totaling of KRW 820 million, and in consideration of the amount written down payment and the remainder under the sales contract, the sales amount should have been KRW 820 million, excluding interest, but it seems that the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to KRW 810 million, depending on an error in calculation.

section 30.

6. By June 28, 2009, under paragraph 4, Gap shall impair Eul with all of the principal registration documents based on provisional registration.

7. By May 30, 2010, “A” settled down the amount of the performance to “B” and repay the said amount.