The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below (two months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime No. 1 of the judgment below, and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime No. 2 of the judgment below) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the fact that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of each of the crimes of this case, the amount of theft damage is not significant, and the health is not good, even if the defendant had been punished several times, he repeats the larceny crimes through several times, including the past thief, drinking, driving without license, etc., even though he had been punished several times, and thereby repeatedly commits the crime of larceny, interference with duties, intimidation, drinking, and driving without license. In particular, each of the crimes of this case is a crime committed during the period of suspended execution due to the crime of the same type, and not only did it reach agreement with the victims up to the trial but also did not recover material damage, and all of the circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure: Provided, That “No. 28, 2014.” in Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure shall be “No. 29, 2014.” and “No. 2,” in Article 16 of the same Act, “No. 16,” “No. 5,” and “No. 5,” in Section 3, Section 7, “No. 1,” and “No. 2,” in Section 2, 200, shall be corrected to “No. 2,” respectively.