The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (one and half years of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant had no record of criminal punishment prior to the death of the Defendant, the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and made the mistake late later, and that the online game “Ieman” is not an unauthorized or unregistered speculative game, but an ordinary game machine transaction is possible if it is excluded from the cases prohibited under the Game Industry Promotion Act, and that the Defendant’s family and branch members want the Defendant’s preference, which is favorable to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant in collusion with F, etc., in order to operate the "I", which is the result obtained through the abnormal use of Ne-Games, which is the result of the crime of this case. The crime of this case was committed by multiple persons in a systematic manner, such as the establishment and operation of I. Among them, the defendant led the crime of this case, such as the establishment and operation of I. It was considerably prolonged period of one year and eight months, and the size of money exchange exceeds six billion won, and the profit of the defendant acquired by the crime of this case reaches one billion won, which is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances and other factors of sentencing, including the background of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, and environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition. (2) Of the summary of evidence of the judgment below, the defendant purchased game money as stated in the judgment of the court below.